|
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nanotechnology and the Environment: A Mismatch between Claims and Reality
Summary posted by Meridian on 7/20/2009 Two international coalitions of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are challenging industry claims about the potential environmental benefits provided by nanotechnology products. The groups, the European Environmental Bureau and the International POPs Elimination Network (IPEN) Nanotechnology Working Group, state that emerging evidence is showing that the claims put forth by industry regarding nanotechnology do not provide the whole picture, and that environmental risks and costs are being trivialized or ignored. The groups argue that any reductions in environmental impacts or in ecological footprint achieved through nanotechnology need to be carefully assessed against the environmental costs of nanomaterial production. Their paper outlines, in detail, the many concerns of the organizations, such as claims that nanotechnology will deliver cleaner production and reduce energy consumption, and proposes solutions. They conclude by calling for "...better governance of technological innovation with clearer sustainability objectives and higher quality environmental risk and life cycle assessment." They go on to say that "[W]e are therefore concerned that rather than providing real solutions to our most pressing problems, nanotechnologies will underpin a new wave of industrial expansion that will magnify existing resource and energy use and exacerbate environmental destruction. Without a proper and comprehensive risk and life cycle analysis to balance the current commercialisation of high-risk applications with little or no proven societal benefits, environmental costs could be high and the technology as a whole distrusted or rejected by the public." The article can be viewed online at the link below. The original article may still be available at www.nanowerk.com/news/newsid=11736.php As tagged by Meridian Institute:
Energy:
Energy, Climate Change Related Forums: |
Understanding Public Debate on Nanotechnologies: Options for Framing Public Policy
-- The Innovation Society (2/8/2010) The Governance and Ethics Unit of the Directorate General for Research (DG Research) of the European Commission (EC) has published an overview paper on options for framing public policy on nanotechnologies. [More]
UN Patent Filings Dropped for 1st Time Since 1978
-- ABC news (2/8/2010) The United Nations World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), an entity through which a company can, for a fee, file a request for patent protection in any or all of the 142 countries that have subscribed to the U.N.'s Patent Cooperation Treaty, reported that the number of international patent filings dropped last year for the first time since 1978. [More]
TECHNOLOGY: Science Panel Probes Renewable Energy's Current Use of China's Rare Metals
-- Environment & Energy Daily (2/8/2010) A United States House of Representatives Science and Technology subcommittee this week will hold a hearing on rare earth mineral production and the resource's role in the growing clean energy industry. [More]
Nanofood for Thought
-- Nature Nanotechnology (2/5/2010) This editorial, in the journal Nature Nanotechnology, is in response to the recent report, "Nanotechnologies and Food", released in January by the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee, United Kingdom, that criticized the food industry for failing to be transparent about its research into the uses of nanotechnologies and nanomaterials. [More]
Learn how to include these headlines on your own website by clicking here.
Please email us if you require text-only versions of the daily emails.
|